Friday, October 29, 2010
NEWS UPDATE 20th July 2010: Julia Gillard Treason Charge
by Logan R. Anderson
Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been charged with Acts of Treason before the Courts of Australia. This is being concealed by the Governor General Quentin Bryce, the Judiciary and the Press ... who are also implicated in the treason. Brian Shaw, who has laid these charges, provides the following update.
The following Statement was released by Brian Shaw on 20th July 2010:
Documents from the Australian Electoral Commission state that the disqualification of the Commonwealth of Australia renders a person incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a member of either House. The disqualifications operate from the time the process of election starts, that process includes Nomination of Candidates.
On 1st January 2004, the Government of Western Australia, without referendum process, removed the State of Western Australia from the Crown of the United Kingdom and as such committed treason against the Constitution. After 1st January 2004, all Senators and House of Representatives from Western Australia did conceal this material fact from the people of Western Australia, and the Commonwealth of Australia.
By so doing Senators and House of Representatives from Western Australia already ‘Attainted of Treason’, did sit in the Senate and House of Representatives in the Howard / Costello reign in Constitutional Breach of Section 44 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act.
In the period 15th December 2006 – 29th January 2007, 40 individuals were charged by Private Prosecution Right at the Melbourne Magistrates Court in Melbourne Victoria, inclusive of Julia Gillard
The Chief Magistrate Ian Gray stated in the Court on 15th December 2006:-
“You will not be relying on the Constitution in my court”.
Chief Magistrate Ian Gray was charged for this statement and concealment, but remains as Chief Magistrate today.
All defendants inclusive of Julia Gillard, John Howard, Kim Beasley, Ian Gray, Damian Bugg, Michael Jeffery and others remain criminally charged, pending Grand Jury hearings, which are currently blocked by President Chris Maxwell and Chief Justice Marilyn Warren of the Supreme Court of Victoria in an endeavour to protect all named defendants from Grand Jury process.
In the Rudd / Gillard Government and Parliament, both houses, Senate and House of Representatives, have sat unlawfully during the entire term, because of the unlawful removal of the Crown of the United Kingdom from Western Australia.
In the current unlawful and illegal condition of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, any political party or person who selects a candidate, inclusive of the candidate to seek a seat in either House of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia will be ‘Attainted of Treason’ and automatically disqualified, in addition to the criminal process and penalty involving Treason, found at Section 80 of the Criminal Code Act Commonwealth 1995.
The following key facts have been uncovered:
1. The oath / affirmation that Julia Gillard affirmed, is not the oath / affirmation of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. A different oath / affirmation was substituted without referendum consent.
2. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia under Rudd and Gillard for the last number of years has sat unlawfully, because the Crown of the United Kingdom was removed and substituted from Western Australia without referendum consent on 1st January 2004.
3. The criminal offence of Treason was committed when the Crown of the United Kingdom was removed from the State of Western Australia without the required State and Commonwealth Referendums on 1st January 2004.
4. Julia Gillard, John Howard, Kim Beasley, Michael Jeffrey, Damian Bugg and others in the period 15th December 2006 and 29th January 2007, were criminally charged by Private Prosecution Right at the Melbourne Magistrates Court in this period. In addition Grand Jury applications were lodged at the Full Court of the Supreme Court Melbourne Victoria on each defendant.
5. Julia Gillard has not revealed that these criminal charges exist. Julia Gillard was charged with concealing treason, and as such is disqualified from sitting in either House of Parliament because of Section 44 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.
6. The Australian Election Paper relating to nominations states:-
“The disqualification in Section 44 renders a person incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a member of either house. The disqualifications therefore operate from the time the process of election starts that process, including Nomination of Candidates”
For more specific information relating to these criminal offences and the concealment of the existence of these offences, please refer to www.elijahschallenge.net
Earlier Article - published June 2010 - At the time Julia Gillard was illegally sworn in as PM
Julia Gillard knifes Kevin Rudd in the back to take his job as Prime Minister. What has been concealed is that Ms Gillard has been charged before the courts of Australia for the crime of 'Treason' ... an indictable offence which must be trialled before a Grand Jury. This has been suppressed by the Judiciary and the Press, who are therefore also liable for 'Treason'.
How could this be? What is the background to this amazing situation?
The following indepth article is based on the case prepared by the plaintiff in this charge, a Mr Brian Shaw of Werrribee, Victoria, Australia.
This article was in the process of being prepared for publication in Omegatimes when the extraordinary events that have taken place in Australia today began to unfold.
Before I go into the background regarding the charge and summons of the Act of Treason that has been brought against Julia Gillard, and others in the political and judicial fraternity in Australia, I want to provide an illustration that places what has happened into a Biblical context.
There is an abject and urgent need for The People ... namely God's People to come down from the hills, and emerge from the caves and exchange "TRUCE" for "TRUTH"!
In Scripture (1 Kings 1:5-) there is one who seeks to claim the throne (Adonijah) without mandate (David's endorsement)
Adonijah is supported in this illegitimate initiative by Joab (Authorities) and Abiathar (The Church) ... who were also guilty of Treason - by association.
It required the rising up of the upholders of Truth and Law to overthrow the imposter and establish the legitimate successor to the Throne, (Solomon) endorsed by David, initiated by Bathsheba.
These true believers - Zadok, Benaiah, Nathan, Shimei, Rei and the 'Mighty Men' represent those authorities and The Church who are loyal and true, and who are not prepared to take a luke-warm compromised position of indifference.
Julia Gillard is charged with TREASON. This is not about her betrayal of Kevin Rudd, or her gender, or even her personal political ideology. She is, indeed, a very gifted and skillful politician, amiable, articulate and outwardly gracious.
This is about her BETRAYAL to the CROWN, The CONSTITUTION, and the PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA, and its also about the betrayal by those who endorse her, and the BETRAYAL OF THOSE WHO REMAIN SILENT.
The emperor is wearing no clothes,
and nobody has the guts to say so.
The church that remains silent at this time
IS ALSO CHARGABLE WITH TREASON!
The NWO and One World Government is behind what is happening ... and this places these events into an 'End Times' context. The following is the basis of Brian Shaw's charges against Ms Julia Gillard et al, with supporting information and documentation.
1. What is the offence of 'Treason' and how and when does it occur
2. Julia Gillard was charged for 'Treason' on 29th January 2007, but this criminal charge was suppressed by the Supreme Court of Victoria, and remains suppressed.
3. Julia should have stood down when the criminal charge was filed and served, and declared the fact to the public. The concealment remains today.
4. The central issue is a constitutional and criminal infraction of Section 44(I) and 44(II) of the Commonwealth Constitution. Such section states that the person would be disqualified from sitting in either House:
Section 44 of the Constitution sets out restrictions on who can be a candidate for Federal parliament. In full it reads:
‘44. Any person who -
(i.) Is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power: or
(ii.) Is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer: or
(iii.) Is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent: or
(iv.) Holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any f the revenues of the Commonwealth: or
(v.) Has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons:
A copy of the 'Charge and Summons' document is set out below
Why has Julia Gillard and others been charged for committing Treason
1. They breached their oath of allegiance concerning the people of Australia
2. Julia Gillard and others have broken the existing law to enable them to substitute another law.
3. There was no permission or referendum sought to alter or substitute another law.
How can this happen?
If you think this cannot happen, that will be the biggest error you will make ... because it has already happened!
After the referendum decision of November 1999, the people working to bring Australia and all Australians into 'Their law' began to change law in Parliaments, Courts, Judgements and structure, to capture Australians in a situation that they could not alter.
The law that is being substituted is coming out of the United Nations and is being silently placed into position using every Masonic position within Australia assisted by the Trade Unions.
If Julia Gillard - Prime Minister appointee from today - and others are allowed to continue to substitute the established Law with another Law, without the knowledge or consent of Australians, then the nation will awaken to another Law that is out of their control ... A new, illigitemate Constitution spawned in the recesses of the United Nations
Five principal substitutions will be:
1. The total abolution of the right to own land (Section 3.49-52, page 29)
2. The abolution of existing states (Section 5.1, page 39, Section 19.58-62, page103 and Section 19.74, page 104)
3. For religious instruction - three religions must be present at time of instruction (Section 3.34-38, page 27)
4. The legal right for cross-examination in a court room will be removed. (Section 17.60-63, page 86)
5. The whole banking system and money structure will be altered (Section 19.21-26, page 98)
Further information and links:
For a complete copy of the Application against Julia Gillard that Brian Shaw has submitted for Grand Jury ... click here http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal/grandjury/Gillard%20Grand%20Jury.pdf
For other document, information and material is it relates to this feature ... click here
The Queensland Fraud ... click here http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal/grandjury/Gillard%20Grand%20Jury.pdf
The Socialist - Communist Constitution ... click here
The following video clips provide further information:
Monday, October 25, 2010
Note: There was so little public attention and notice to the need for a ban on marijuana, or the resulting legislation (Marihuana Tax Act of 1937), that the editors apparently did not realize that it had already been outlawed when they published this article.
AMERICAN farmers are promised a new cash crop with an annual value of several hundred million dollars, all because a machine has been invented which solves a problem more than 6,000 years old. It is hemp, a crop that will not compete with other American products.
Instead, it will displace imports of raw material and manufactured products produced by underpaid coolie and peasant labor and it will provide thousands of jobs for American workers throughout the land.
The machine which makes this possible is designed for removing the fiber-bearing cortex from the rest of the stalk, making hemp fiber available for use without a prohibitive amount of human labor. Hemp is the standard fiber of the world. It has great tensile strength and durability. It is used to produce more than 5,000 textile products, ranging from rope to fine laces, and the woody "hurds" remaining after the fiber has been removed contain more than seventy-seven per cent cellulose, and can be used to produce more than 25,000 products, ranging from dynamite to Cellophane.
Machines now in service in Texas, Illinois, Minnesota and other states are producing fiber at a manufacturing cost of half a cent a pound, and are finding a profitable market for the rest of the stalk. Machine operators are making a good profit in competition with coolie-produced foreign fiber while paying farmers fifteen dollars a ton for hemp as it comes from the field.
From the farmers' point of view, hemp is an easy crop to grow and will yield from three to six tons per acre on any land that will grow corn, wheat, or oats. It has a short growing season, so that it can be planted after other crops are in. It can be grown in any state of the union. The long roots penetrate and break the soil to leave it in perfect condition for the next year's crop. The dense shock of leaves, eight to twelve feet above the ground, chokes out weeds. Two successive crops are enough to reclaim land that has been abandoned because of Canadian thistles or quack grass.
Under old methods, hemp was cut and allowed to lie in the fields for weeks until it "retted" enough so the fibers could be pulled off by hand. Retting is simply rotting as a result of dew, rain and bacterial action. Machines were developed to separate the fibers mechanically after retting was complete, but the cost was high, the loss of fiber great, and the quality of fiber comparatively low.
With the new machine, known as a decorticator, hemp is cut with a slightly modified grain binder. It is delivered to the machine where an automatic chain conveyor feeds it to the breaking arms at the rate of two or three tons per hour. The hurds are broken into fine pieces which drop into the hopper, from where they are delivered by blower to a baler or to truck or freight car for loose shipment. The fiber comes from the other end of the machine, ready for baling.
From this point on almost anything can happen. The raw fiber can be used to produce strong twine or rope, woven into burlap, used for carpet warp or linoleum backing or it may be bleached and refined, with resinous by-products of high commercial value. It can, in fact, be used to replace the foreign fibers which now flood our markets.
Thousands of tons of hemp hurds are used every year by one large powder company for the manufacture of dynamite and TNT. A large paper company, which has been paying more than a million dollars a year in duties on foreign-made cigarette papers, now is manufacturing these papers from American hemp grown in Minnesota. A new factory in Illinois is producing fine bond papers from hemp. The natural materials in hemp make it an economical source of pulp for any grade of paper manufactured, and the high percentage of alpha cellulose promises an unlimited supply of raw material for the thousands of cellulose products our chemists have developed.
It is generally believed that all linen is produced from flax. Actually, the majority comes from hemp--authorities estimate that more than half of our imported linen fabrics are manufactured from hemp fiber. Another misconception is that burlap is made from hemp. Actually, its source is usually jute, and practically all of the burlap we use is woven by laborers in India who receive only four cents a day. Binder twine is usually made from sisal which comes from Yucatan and East Africa.
All of these products, now imported, can be produced from home- grown hemp. Fish nets, bow strings, canvas, strong rope, overalls, damask tablecloths, fine linen garments, towels, bed linen and thousands of other everyday items can be grown on American farms.
Our imports of foreign fabrics and fibers average about $200,000,000 per year; in raw fibers alone we imported over $50,000,000 in the first six months of 1937. All of this income can be made available for Americans.
The paper industry offers even greater possibilities. As an industry it amounts to over $1,000,000,000 a year, and of that eighty per cent is imported. But hemp will produce every grade of paper, and government figures estimate that 10,000 acres devoted to hemp will produce as much paper as 40,000 acres of average pulp land.
One obstacle in the onward march of hemp is the reluctance of farmers to try new crops. The problem is complicated by the need for proper equipment a reasonable distance from the farm. The machine cannot be operated profitably unless there is enough acreage within driving range and farmers cannot find a profitable market unless there is machinery to handle the crop. Another obstacle is that the blossom of the female hemp plant contains marijuana, a narcotic, and it is impossible to grow hemp without producing the blossom. Federal regulations now being drawn up require registration of hemp growers, and tentative proposals for preventing narcotic production are rather stringent.
However, the connection of hemp as a crop and marijuana seems to be exaggerated. The drug is usually produced from wild hemp or locoweed which can be found on vacant lots and along railroad tracks in every state. If federal regulations can be drawn to protect the public without preventing the legitimate culture of hemp, this new crop can add immeasurably to American agriculture and industry."Popular Mechanics Magazine" can furnish the name and address of the maker of, or dealer in, any article described in its pages. If you wish this information, write to the Bureau of Information, enclosing a stamped, self-addressed envelope.
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Social Insurance Number Authentication
The Social Insurance Number (SIN) was created in 1964 to serve as a client account number in the administration of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Canada's varied employment insurance programs. In 1967, Revenue Canada, now called
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA) Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), co-opted the SIN and started using it for tax reporting purposes. Since then, things have gotten way out of control.
The SIN is arguably your most valuable identification number and should be closely guarded. A person possessing your SIN can easily apply for a credit card or open a bank account, rent vehicles, equipment, or accommodation -- all in your name and you will be held responsible by authorities. Never use your SIN number as identification except where required by law.
The only legislated uses of the SIN are: Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, your employer for Income Tax reporting, banks (with some exceptions), Social Assistance programs, and a few other government and/or tax related agencies. When in doubt make them prove that you are legally obligated to provide your SIN. Unless an organization can demonstrate that your SIN is required by law, or that no alternative identifier would suffice to complete the transaction, you cannot be denied a product or service on the grounds of your refusal to provide your SIN. Banks don't even require your SIN anymore when you open an account. Since interest rates are so low and service charges are so high, they are finally acknowledging that it more than cancels out any interest you could ever hope to get. You may find some banks that try to insist that you provide your SIN. Be persistent and/or shop around.
Widespread use of the SIN as identification has put many people's personal information and privacy at risk. Computer technology makes it possible to use the SIN to find and match your information from one database to another; thereby facilitating the creation of a detailed profile about you. Of course, if you are using credit/debit cards you are already seriously fucked in that regard.
Indeed, the truly enlightened citizen probably realizes that they should have never applied for a SIN in the first place.
Social Insurance Numbers are validated via a simple checksum process.
Let's use this fictitious SIN to demonstrate:
046 454 286 < Try substituting your SIN
046 454 286 \ Multiply each top number
121 212 121 / by the number below it..
086 858 276 < and get this.
Notice here that 8*2=16, add 1 and
6 together and get 7. If you get a
2 digit # add the digits together.
Add all of these digits together.
If the SIN is valid this # will
be evenly divisible by 10. This
is a 'valid' SIN.
The first digit of a SIN indicates province of registration.
| || |
Furthermore, it seems the second and third digits can be related to the birth-date of the SIN holder, or probably more accurately, the date period in which the SIN was registered. For this analysis I've had to rely on date of birth since most people don't know when they registered for their SIN. (Though the average age of registration seems to be around 17.) (Note: In the case of SIN's starting with 9 I am tracking date of registration.) We can clearly see a pattern in the tables below. SIN's appear to be assigned incrementally by region. More data is still required to complete this analysis and furnish comprehensive tables.
At the present time I have kept the prairie provinces seperated from one another and done the same for the maritimes. Though it is definitely looking like they are treated as groups and I may merge their respective sets of data once I have collected enough to prove this conclusively.
A reader (who should probably remain anonymous) sent in this excellent spreadsheet which shows the average age for a given 3-digit SIN prefix based on data gleaned from a database to which the reader had access.
I would like to thank everyone who has contributed data in an effort to further this project. It has certainly helped answer some questions. Everyone I have spoken to, even government employees at the provincial and federal levels, has told me that there is absolutely no correlation between the SIN and birth-date or date of registration. I think it is very clear now that there is a direct correlation and that a person's age can be fairly accurately estimated based on their SIN.
A lot of data is still needed to finish the above tables, so if you havn't submitted the first 3 digits of your SIN along with province of registration and date of birth, please e-mail it to me. Thanks.
- Assumimg the name of someone deceased who has not been recorded as dead in the SIN registry. According to the SIN registry, over 300,000 dead Canadians are still alive.
- Assuming a living persons identity.
- Using a false birth certificate to obtain one.
- Temporary SINs issued to foreign students and other non-permanent residents.
There are almost 4 million more active SINs than there are people in Canada. Opportunities for SIN abuse are numerous and include fraudulently obtaining government benefits, insurance, and credit cards. These are also some of the reasons why you shouldn't divulge your SIN to anyone but your employer and the tax-man.
Methods for aquiring SINs include:
To make matters worse (or better, depending on your angle), SIN fraud investigations carried out by the federal Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC: the same people responsible for the ridiculously inaccurate SIN registry) are weak or non-existant. The maximum penalty for SIN fraud is a $1,000 fine and one year in prison. Though fines of a couple hundred dollars with no prison time are the norm for the few who are actually caught and prosecuted.
The SIN algorithm is commonly known as the LUHN algorithm or the mod-10 algorithm. It also happens to be used to validate Credit Card numbers among other things.
The SIN algorithm can be arranged to generate as well as validate.
A more accurate and suitable acronym for SIN is "Slave Identification Number". This document and its related links may shed some light on this, or perhaps not. Our slave-masters have crafted one of the most incomprehensible and maze-like shit-piles of verbiage that is designed to confuse us into believing the sweat of our brow is their property. When you apply for a SIN, you become a volunteer slave.
When fabricating a SIN it is probably best to start with the first three digits of someone's SIN in the particular province you want, who is in your age group, then build it from that.
The Seven Deadly Sins are Pride, Envy, Gluttony, Lust, Anger, Greed, and Sloth.
The Canadian government uses the same authentication algorithm on many, if not all, of its "unique" numbers. It is used for employer account numbers, trust numbers, Income Tax Filer identification (your H&R Block e-file rep), and the first nine digits of the Business Number (BN). When there are letters in the identification number the following table is used to convert the letters to numbers:
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|1040-B 20th, Street West|
|Motor Vehicle Act|
|Message|| Hi, my name is Jackie Grant Veloise: Harper I have been reading your Motor Vehicle Act. I have a few questions. Since it is by asking that we learn, I hope you don't mind what should be very simple questions for you. You see, I would hate to unknowingly break the law and I also have no desire to unknowingly put myself in a contract where none is needed. |
The first question has to do with the definition of 'motor vehicle'.
"motor vehicle" means a vehicle, not run on rails, that is designed to be self propelled or propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires;
Is it a full and complete definition? If you wish to say it is then I must ask is the definition of accident a full and complete definition?
"accident" includes an intentional collision;
(It is obvious that the definition of accident is neither full nor complete, therefore the definition of motor vehicle is not either. If one is and one isn't how do you tell? )
An apple is a red round fruit. Does that mean that all red round fruits are apples? What about pomegranates, then? You see, I realize that the definition of motor vehicle is doing one of two things. It is either fully describing or merely partially describing. If it is the latter then there must be other attributes to a 'motor vehicle'.
This brings me to my next question.
Registration and license
3 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the owner of a motor vehicle or trailer must, before it is used or operated on a highway,
(a) register the motor vehicle or trailer with the Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
(b) obtain a license for its operation under this section, and
(c) obtain for it a certificate of insurance under the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act.
(2) Despite subsection (1), a trailer towed by a tractor licensed under section 8 need not be licensed.
(3) The owner must apply for
(a) registration and license in the form required by the Saskatchewan Government Insurance, and
(b) a motor vehicle liability policy in accordance with the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act and regulations under that Act.
These words are in your act. Is this perhaps the missing part of your definition, or maybe a part of the missing pieces? This section is doing one of two things; creating an obligation for you or for me. If I have a ‘thing’, which appears to match your definition of ‘motor vehicle’, and that definition is full and complete, then the obligation is mine. If however it is not a full and complete definition, then this sentence creates an obligation for you to prove that an act of registration took place before you can claim my 'thing' is a 'motor vehicle'. See the difference?
Now, since I know that an act of registration involves also an act of submission and an act of application and I know an application is a request, do you claim that I am obligated to request or apply? I believe that in law, nobody is ever obligated to request, plead or beg. We certainly are not obligated to submit. Submission is always a choice.
I hope we are finding our common ground here. I have but a few more questions at this time.
Is there any part of your act, which clearly, specifically and unequivocally removes my Common Law Right to 'Travel' on a public highway with my own private conveyance of the day? I could not find it. If any part of your act does so, please point it out. If you are incapable of pointing that out, will you please acknowledge that such a right does in fact still exist, regardless of how many people are presently exercising it? If not, then why not?
Now, there are armed people out on the highways, who if I try to exercise my right to travel, will because of the confusion in your act, feel they have the right to stop, detain and harass me. Apparently, they failed to question like I do and act on assumptions. I do not. They believe that the word 'must' creates an obligation on my part and they fail to realize that 'must' means 'may'. If these people are out there acting as your Agents, do you not have an obligation to inform them as to the limits of their powers? If your Agents stop me from exercising my rights, are you not then to blame, especially if you failed to inform them about the limits of their powers? I feel you are.
If everyone else on the highway chooses to enter into a contract with you and be deemed a 'driver' instead of exercising his or her common law right to travel, does that mean I am obligated to enter into a contract with you? In law contracts must be voluntary. This is as it should be.
Let us say that I am lawfully exercising my right to travel and I am stopped by one of your agents. Can your Agent claim that I am 'driving' an 'unregistered motor vehicle' even if the act of registration is required before you can even call my 'thing' a 'motor vehicle'?
So to sum up, here are my very simple questions in point form. Please save me the time and trouble of doing a Determination by Proxy and answer these questions truthfully and completely and in good faith. Please do not answer any question unless the previous one was answered first. Circle your answer please.
1- Is the definition of motor vehicle in your act a full and complete definition? Yes or No
2- Do the words "The owner must apply for" create an obligation on my part? Yes or No
3- Do the words "The owner must apply for" create an obligation on your part to prove such an act took place before you can claim my 'thing' is a motor vehicle? Yes or No
4- Is there a section of the Motor Vehicle Act which clearly, specifically and unequivocally removes my right to travel on a public highway in my own private conveyance? Yes or No
5- Do you acknowledge that such a right, though not widely exercised still exist? Yes or No?
6- Are you as the Principle obligated to inform your Agents as to their powers and the limits on their powers? Yes or No.
7- Is an act of 'Application' required for me to register a 'motor vehicle'? Yes or No
8- Are you liable for the actions of your Agents in the performance of their duties? Yes or No
9- Is a Drivers License a Contract? Yes or No
10- Am I obligated to enter into a contract in order to exercise my rights? Yes or No
11- When I exercise my right and an armed agent of yours stops me, do you realize that you are liable? Yes or No
12- Do you realize that being stopped by an armed man for no other reason than exercising a right is a violation of my human rights? Yes or No
13- If one of your Agents does stop me, I will claim that you as principal were negligent in your duties to inform him as to his powers. I will then sue you for negligence and for infringing on my Rights. Do you accept my right to sue you for the actions of your agents? Yes or No
14- Do you agree to immediately pay me One Million Canadian Dollars ($1,000,000) if due to your negligence one of your Agents stops me? Yes or No
15- Am I requesting through an act of application to have my thing considered a motor vehicle? Yes or No
Thank you for your time. Please answer all of these questions. Failure to answer within 10 days will result in another letter. It will be a Determination by Proxy. That is where your silence is all I need to create an agreement.
Thanks and have a great day!
Sincerely looking forward to exercising my right to travel without interference from the less informed.
Jackie Grant Veloice: Harper
1040-B 20th., Street West, Saskatoon, Sask.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
When people are exposed to excessive levels of fluoride through sources like drinking water, foods and beverages and even swallowed toothpaste, it often results in a condition known as dental fluorosis. The internal uptake of fluoride into teeth over time causes their enamel to become mottled and discolored, the end result being damaged teeth that have essentially rotted from the inside out.
Dr. Steven Levy, D.D.S., and his team found during their study that "fluoride intakes during each of the first four years (of a child's life) were individually significantly related to fluorosis on maxillary central incisors, with the first year more important." They went on to warn that "infant formulas reconstituted with higher fluoride water can provide 100 to 200 times more fluoride than breast milk, or cow's milk."
In other words, young children have the highest risk of severe tooth damage from fluoride, especially those that are six months of age or younger, a time during which children's blood-brain barriers have not fully formed. Even low ingestion levels cause the direct depositing of fluoride into the teeth, brain and other bodily tissues and organs which, besides causing fluorosis, also causes disorders of the brain and nervous system, kidneys and bones.
And the American Dental Association (ADA) has known that fluoride exposure causes dental fluorosis since at least 2006, but the group has done nothing to warn the 200 million Americans that live in communities with fluoridated water to avoid its use in babies and infants. Many dentists still recommend that children and adults not only drink fluoridated water, but even advise parents to add fluoride drops to their children's drinking water if the family lives in unfluoridated areas or drinks private well water.
Fluoride causes serious health problemsIn 2006, a study published in The Lancet identified fluoride as "an emerging neurotoxic substance" that causes severe brain damage. The National Research Council (NRC) wrote that "it is apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain and the body by direct and indirect means."
About a month later, another study published in Environmental Health Perspectives found a definitive link between fluoride intake and reduce IQ levels, indicating once again that fluoride intake causes cognitive damage.
At Harvard University, researchers identified a link between fluoride and bone cancer. Published 14 years after it began, the study found that the highest rates of osteosarcoma, a fatal form of bone cancer, were occurring most in populations drinking fluoridated water. The findings confirmed those of a prior government study back in 1990 that involved fluoride-treated rats.
Kidney disease is another hallmark of fluoride poisoning. Multiple animal studies have found that fluoride levels as low as 1 part per million (ppm) -- which is the amount added to most fluoridated water systems -- cause kidney damage. And a Chinese study found that children exposed to slightly higher fluoride levels had biological markers in their blood indicative of kidney damage.
The NRC has also found that fluoride impairs proper thyroid function and debilitates the endocrine system. Up until the 1970s, fluoride was used in Europe as a thyroid-suppressing medication because it lowers thyroid function. Many experts believe that widespread hypothyroidism today is a result of overexposure to fluoride.
Since fluoride is present in most municipal water supplies in North America, it is absurd to even suggest that parents avoid giving it to their young children. How are parents supposed to avoid it unless they install a whole-house reverse osmosis water filtration system? And even if families install such a system, fluoride is found in all sorts of food and beverages, not to mention that it is absorbed through the skin every time people wash their hands with or take a shower in fluoridated water. Perhaps these are some of the reasons why the ADA has said nothing about the issue despite the findings.
There simply is no legitimate reason to fluoridate water. Doing so forcibly medicates an entire population with a carcinogenic, chemical drug. There really is no effective way to avoid it entirely, and nobody really knows how much is ingested or absorbed on a daily basis because exposure is too widespread to calculate. But political pressure and bad science have continued to justify water fluoridation in most major cities, despite growing mountains of evidence showing its dangers.
Ending water fluoridation is a difficult task, but concerted efforts by citizens, local authorities, and even dentists, have resulted in some significant victories. To learn more about fluoride, check out the Fluoride Action Network (FAN):
Sources for this story include:
Sunday, October 17, 2010
The Water Cure Recipe:
Drink 1/2 your body weight of water in ounces, daily. Example 180 lb = 90 oz. of water daily. Divide that into 8 or 10 oz. glasses and that's how many glasses you will need to drink, daily. Use 1/4 tsp. of salt for every quart of water you drink. Use salt liberally with food. As long as you drink the water, you can use the salt. Avoid caffeinated or alcoholic drinks. These are diuretics and will dehydrate you. Every 6 oz. of caffeine or alcohol requires an additional 10 to 12 oz. of water to re-hydrate you.
P.S. (USE Clean Water, Use non-refined, ocean salt ONLY )
Benefits of Unrefined Ocean Salt
Water-Nature's Thirst Quencher
Over half of your body is made up of water. It's in every cell and every tissue. Biological processes like circulation, digestion, absorption and excretion depend on water. It forms the foundation of blood and lymph, maintains hearty muscles and young-looking skin, lubricates joints and organs and regulates body temperature. You can't function without it.
As you grow older, it becomes vital to pay attention to your water consumption. Mature persons hold less cellular water, with a loss of 10 to 15 percent of previous capacity by the age of 65. A contributing factor is the loss of thirst sensitivity. Because water is so important for digestion, a lack of fluid in your body might make it more difficult for you to digest food. You may suffer from cramps, bloating, gas, constipation, diveritculosis or even colon cancer. Drinking more water, combined with a high-fiber diet, can prevent these problems.
To combat this loss of fluids, the answer is simple. Drink more water. Six to ten glasses of pure water each day are necessary to enhance your body's functioning. Beyond helping your digestive system, getting enough fluids will give you fresh skin, clear eyes and shining hair. Signs of hunger may be a warning flag that your body is need of a good drink. Try consuming several glasses of water before diving into a snack to see if that takes care of your craving. Because fruits are largely made up of water, they are perfect choices for a mid-afternoon treat.
To understand what is the function of Water inside our body, read book:
"Your Body's Many Cries for Water" by F. Batmanghelidj, M.D.
Your Body's Many Cries for Water $14.95
Your Body's Many Cries for Water $14.95
How to Deal Simply With Back Pain and Rheumatoid Joint Pain $14.95
ABC of Asthma, Allergies and Lupus: Eradicate Asthma - Now! $17.00
Water : Rx for a Healthier, Pain-Free Life $67.00
From the book:
"Your Body's Many Cries for Water"
AMAZING SECRETS FOR HEALTH AND WELLNESS
AMAZING SECRETS FOR HEALTH AND WELLNESS
Cure # 1: Water prevents and cures heartburn.
Heartburn is a signal of water shortage in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract. It is a major thirst signal of the human body. The use of antacids or tablet medications in the treatment of this pain does not correct dehydration, and the body continues to suffer as a result of its water shortage.
Tragedy: Not recognizing heartburn as a sign of dehydration and treating it with antacids and pill medications will, in time, produce inflammation of the stomach and duodenum, hiatal hernia, ulceration, and eventually cancers in the gastrointestinal tract, including the liver and pancreas.
Cure # 2: Water prevents and cures arthritis.
Rheumatoid joint pain - arthritis - is a signal of water shortage in the painful joint. It can affect the young as well as the old. The use of pain-killers does not cure the problem, but exposes the person to further damage from pain medications. Intake of water and small amounts of salt will cure this problem.
Cure # 3: Water prevents and cures back pain.
Low back pain and ankylosing arthritis of the spine are signs of water shortage in the spinal column and discs - the water cushions that support the weight of the body. These conditions should be treated with increased water intake - not a commercial treatment, but a very effective one.
Tragedy: Not recognizing arthritis and low back pain as signs of dehydration in the joint cavities and treating them with pain-killers, manipulation, acupuncture, and eventually surgery will, in time, produce osteoarthritis when the cartilage cells in the joints have eventually all died. It will produce deformity of the spine. It will produce crippling deformities of the limbs. Pain medications have their own life-threatening complications.
Cure # 4: Water prevents and cures angina.
Heart pain - angina - is a sign of water shortage in the heart/lung axis. It should be treated with increased water intake until the patient is free of pain and independent of medications. Medical supervision is prudent. However, increased water intake is angina's cure.
Cure # 5: Water prevents and cures migraines.
Migraine headache is a sign of water need by the brain and the eyes. It will totally clear up if dehydration is prevented from establishing in the body. The type of dehydration that causes migraine might eventually cause inflammation of the back of the eye and possibly loss of eye sight.
Cure #6: Water prevents and cures colitis.
Colitis pain is a signal of water shortage in the large gut. It is associated with constipation because the large intestine constricts to squeeze the last drop of water from the excrements - thus the lack of water lubrication.
Tragedy: Not recognizing colitis pain as a sign of dehydration will cause persistent constipation. Later in life, it will cause fecal impacting: it can cause diverticulitis, hemorrhoids and polyps, and appreciably increases the possibility of developing cancer of the colon and rectum.
Cure # 7: Water and salt prevent and cure asthma.
Asthma, which also affects 14 million children and kills several thousand of them every year, is a complication of dehydration in the body. It is caused by the drought management programs of the body. In asthma free passage of air is obstructed so that water does not leave the body in the form of vapor - the winter steam. Increased water intake will prevent asthma attacks. Asthmatics need also to take more salt to break the mucus plugs in the lungs that obstruct the free flow of air in and out of the air sacs.
Tragedy: Not recognizing asthma as the indicator of dehydration in the body of a growing child not only will sentence many thousands of children to die every year, but will permit irreversible genetic damage to establish in the remaining 14 million asthmatic children.
Cure # 8: Water prevents and cures high blood pressure.
Hypertension is a state of adaptation of the body to a generalized drought, when there is not enough water to fill all the blood vessels that diffuse water into vital cells. As part of the mechanism of reverse osmosis, when water from the blood serum is filtered and injected into important cells through minute holes in their membranes, extra pressure is needed for the "injection process." Just as we inject I.V. "water" in hospitals, so the body injects water into tens of trillions of cells all at the same time. Water and some salt intake will bring blood pressure back to normal!
Tragedy: Not recognizing hypertension as one of the major indicators of dehydration in the human body, and treating it with diuretics that further dehydrate the body will, in time, cause blockage by cholesterol of the heart arteries and the arteries that go to the brain. It will cause heart attacks and small or massive strokes that paralyze. It will eventually cause kidney disease. It will cause brain damage and neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease.
Cure # 9: Water prevents and cures early adult-onset diabetes.
Adult-onset diabetes is another adaptive state to severe dehydration of the human body. To have adequate water in circulation and for the brain's priority water needs, the release of insulin is inhibited to prevent insulin from pushing water into all body cells. In diabetes, only some cells get survival rations of water. Water and some salt will reverse adult-onset diabetes in its early stages.
Tragedy: Not recognizing adult-onset diabetes as a complication of dehydration will, in time, cause massive damage to the blood vessels all over the body. It will cause eventual loss of the toes, feet and legs from gangrene. It will cause eye damage, even blindness.
Cure # 10: Water lowers blood cholesterol.
High cholesterol levels are an indicator of early drought management by the body. Cholesterol is a clay-like material that is poured in the gaps of some cell membranes to safeguard them against losing their vital water content to the osmotically more powerful blood circulating in their vicinity. Cholesterol, apart from being used to manufacture nerve cell membranes and hormones, is also used as a "shield" against water taxation of other vital cells that would normally exchange water through their cell membranes.
Cure # 11: Water cures depression, loss of libido, chronic fatigue syndrome, lupus, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy.
These conditions are caused by prolonged chronic dehydration. They will clear up once the body becomes well and regularly hydrated. In these conditions, exercising one's muscles should be part of the treatment program.
For More Information, Read the Book:
Your Body's Many Cries for Water.
by F. Batmanghelidj, M.D.
"Bad Cholesterol": A Myth and a Fraud!
We in the medical profession, totally oblivious of the vital roles of cholesterol in the body, have been duped into thinking that it is this substance that causes arterial disease of the heart and the brain. The pharmaceutical industry has capitalized on the slogan of "bad cholesterol" and has produced toxic-to-the-body chemicals that minimally lower the level of cholesterol in the body and in the process cause liver damage to thousands of people, some who die as a result of using the medication.
It is surprising that none of the frequently quoted and media-popularized doctors has reflected on the fact that cholesterol levels are measured from blood taken from the veins, yet nowhere in medical literature is there a single case of cholesterol having caused obstruction of the veins. Venous blood moves far slower than arterial blood and thus would be more inclined to have cholesterol deposits if the assumption of "bad cholesterol" were accurate. This mistake by us in the medical community, and its capitalization by the pharmaceutical industry, has caused an ongoing fraud against society.
In truth, the so-called "bad" cholesterol is actually far more beneficial than is appreciated. The reason for its rise in the body is because of complications caused by chronic unintentional dehydration and insufficient urine production. Dehydration produces concentrated, acidic blood that becomes even more dehydrated during its passage through the lungs before reaching the heart – because of evaporation of water in the lungs during breathing. The membranes of the blood vessels of the heart and main arteries going up to the brain become vulnerable to the shearing pressure produced by the thicker, acidic blood. This shearing force of toxic blood causes abrasions and minute tears in the lining of the arteries that can peel off and cause embolisms of the brain, kidneys and other organs. To prevent the damaged blood vessel walls from peeling, low-density (so-called "bad") cholesterol coats and covers up the abrasions and protects the underlying tissue like a waterproof bandage until the tissue heals.
Thus, the vital, life-saving role of low-density cholesterol proves this substance is of utmost importance in saving the lives of those who do not adequately hydrate their bodies so that their blood can flow easily through the blood vessels without causing damage.
Cholesterol is an element from which many of our hormones are made. Vitamin D is made by the body from cholesterol in our skin that is exposed to sunlight. Cholesterol is used in the insulating membranes that cover our nerve systems. There is no such a thing as bad cholesterol. If all the primary ingredients are available for its normal functions, the human body does not engage in making things that are bad for its survival. Until now we did not know water was a vital nutrient that the body needed at all times – and in sufficient quantity.
Water itself – not caffeinated beverages that further dehydrate – is a better cholesterol-lowering medication than any chemical on the market. It is absolutely safe and is not harmful to the body like the dangerous medications now used. Please share this information with those you care for.
For more information about my medical breakthrough on the topic of chronic unintentional dehydration and the diseases it causes, other than what is posted on this site, refer to my books and tapes – products of over 20 years of fulltime research.
F. Batmanghelidj, M.D.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
John Joseph, Randy Lee, and Richard Anthony
For those that have never been able to possess a piece of land due to the restraints of the natural man's commercial world order, and have been led thereby to believe that the Lord does not provide for His children at all times, we offer the following revelations to those children who are in the world but not of it, and therefore will not be seeking to make merchandise of our loving Father's Creation and Providence.
The alternative to purchasing a "title" or "deed" to land and paying a yearly rent to Caesar (taxes) because of the commercial status thereof, is to "stand upon the land." The more specific phrase to use is "standing upon land that's sitting in waste," and your purpose is to be a caretaker of it and to cultivate it, as mandated in Holy Scripture. If you are moved by the Holy Spirit to proceed in this manner, it is extremely important that you make it clear to others that you are not standing upon the land to acquire title, deed, or ownership to it—for the land belongs to God, and He commanded that it not be sold forever:
Leviticus 25:23, "The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me."
Leviticus 25:34, "But the field of the suburbs of their cities may not be sold; for it is their perpetual possession."
Psalms 24:1, "The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein."
1 Corinthians 10:26,28 "For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof."
In order to find a piece of land upon which you can stand, the first step is to go to the County Tax Assessor's Office or Recorder of Deeds, i.e., where land records are kept within each county (sometimes located at the courthouse). Therein, locate the alphabetical list of land owners. Do a search for "Unknown owner," "Unclaimed land," or other similar words. This will list pieces of land that have never been registered with the county, i.e., they have never entered commerce. Each piece of land will have a corresponding ten digit "Assessor's ID Number." Use this Assessor ID Number to get the section number of the Plat Map that this land is located on. The section number will look similar to the following— "POR. SEC.14 T.4.N. R.17W." Once you look at this Plat Map (also called a "Licensed Surveyor's Map," or a "Parcel Map"), then you will know the location of this land within the county. There will be names of roads and possibly an address, etc.
Once you find the location of the parcels of unclaimed land, the next step is to physically go to each location and see if it is being used. If there are any signs of it being currently possessed (enclosures, structures, or cultivation), you cannot stand on that land. If, however, this land appears to have never been used, or it appears that it was once used (by having old enclosures and structures on it) but is now abandoned, you may proceed to Stand upon the Land.
Maxims of Law dealing with Possession and Land
* What belongs to no one, naturally belong to the first occupant.
* Possession is a good title, where no better title appears.
* Long possession produces the right of possession, and takes away from the true owner his action.
* Possessor has right against all men but him who has the very right.
* When a man has the possession as well as the right of property, he is said to have jus duplicatum - a double right, forming a complete title.
* A person in possession is not bound to prove that the possessions belong to him.
* Rights of dominion are transferred without title or delivery, by prescription, to wit, long and quiet possession.
* Enjoy your own property in such a manner as not to injure that of another person.
* He who owns the soil, owns up to the sky.
* The owner of a piece of land owns everything above and below it to an indefinite extent.
* Of whom is the land, of him is it also to the sky and to the deepest depths; he who owns the land owns all above and all below the surface.
* Every man's house is his castle.
* A citizen cannot be taken by force from his house to be conducted before a judge or to prison.
* The habitation of each one is an inviolable asylum for him.
* Whatever is affixed to the soil belongs to it.
* With the land goes whatever is on the land planted.
* What is built upon the land, goes with the land: a building follows the ownership of the land.
* Rivers and ports are public, therefore the right of fishing there is common to all.
* Land comprehends any ground soil, or earth whatsoever; as meadows, pastures, woods, moors, waters, and marshes.
Pedis possessio: Possession of the foot: an actual foothold; actual possession of land.
Since standing upon land is a natural symbol of possessing it, the phrase has come to mean actual possession of any particular piece of land, as evidenced by occupation, inclosure, etc. Pedis positio: Placing of the foot; a foothold. A Dictionary of Law, by William C. Anderson (1893), page 789.
Potior est conditio possidentis: The stronger is the condition of the party in possession. A Dictionary of Law, by William C. Anderson (1893), page 790.
Possessor: He who holds, detains, or enjoys a thing as his own.
A bona fide possessor of land is one who not only supposes himself to be the true proprietor, but who is ignorant that his title is contested by another person claiming a better right to the land. 2 Bl. Com. 198, 190.
Court Decisions and Definitions
Actual possession: Exists when a thing is in ones immediate occupancy. Constructive possession: Possession in contemplation of the law. Brown v. volkening, 64 N.Y. 80 (1876), Allen J.; Lillianskyoldt v. Goss, 2 Utah, 297 (1878).
Actual possession, which means a subjection to the will and dominion of the claimant, is usually evidenced by occupation, by a substantial enclosure, by cultivation, or by appropriate use, according to the particular locality and quality of the property. Coryell v. Cain, 16 Cal. 573 (1860), Field, C.J. See also 71 Ala.265; 1 Cal.263; 16 id. 109; 4 Nev. 68; 59 N.Y. 136.
Constructive possession, where there is no actual possession, is in him who has the legal and rightful title. Norris's Appeal, 64 Pa. 282 (1870).
Naked possession: Actual occupation of an estate, without apparent right, or shadow or pretense of right, to hold or continue such possession. Called also bare possession. Gillett v. Gaffney, 3 Col. 360 (1877).
Thus, where one man invades the possession of another, and by force or surprise turns him out of his occupation, till some act be done by the rightful owner to divest this possession is prima facie evidence of a legal title, which, by length of time, may ripen into an indefeasible title. A man out of possession has remaining the right of possession, which is an apparent right of possession, defensible by proof of a better right, and an actual right of possession, which will stand the test against all opponents. 2 Bl. Com. 195-96; 8 id. 177, 179.
To establish your dominion through possession, you will need to avoid using all the terms hereafter. For example, "Adverse Possession" is a statutory term, just as "squatter" is a statutory term. Do not use these terms or answer to them:
Owner or Ownership.
Settler or settle.
Squatter or Squatters Rights.
Adverse Possession or Preemption.
Custody or Custodian.
Estate, Realty or Real Estate
These are not the same as "standing upon the land." The "rights of squatters" are greater than those who hold a legal title, but "standing upon land" is greater than the rights of squatters and adverse possessions. Adverse possession (or pre-emption) is a method of gaining legal title to land by openly occupying the land continuously for a number of years (as set by State law) while claiming "ownership" of the land. "Standing upon the land" has nothing to do with a legal title to and personal ownership of an "estate" or "realty," which are commercial in nature.
Adverse possession: Possession of realty avowedly opposed to some claim of title in another. A Dictionary of Law, by William C. Anderson (1893), page 790.
A possession not under the legal proprietor [owner], but entered into without his consent, directly or indirectly given; a possession by which he is disseised [unlawful dispossession from real property] and ousted. French v. Pierce, 8 Conn. 442-46 (1831), Hosmer, Chief Justice.
An adverse and hostile possession is one held for the possessor, as distinguished from one held in subordination to the right of another; a possession inconsistent with the possession or right of possession by another. Such is an exclusive possession of one who is not in privity with the true owner. "Visible" and "notorious" are terms employed to denote that the possession must be more than secret, and unknown to the disseised owner. Since acquiescence implies knowledge, a possession that he permits must be "notorious" or known to him. Sheaffer v. Eakman, 56 Pa. 153 (1867), Strong J.; Ewing v. Burnet, 11 Pet. 53 (1837).
If under claim of right, and uninterrupted, open, visible, and notorious for twenty years, such possession is evidence of title in the possessor, and a good defense in ejectment. Hogan v. Kurtz, 94 U.S. 776 (1876), cases.
Independently of positive statute law, such a possession affords a presumption that all the claimants to the land acquiesce in the claim of the possessor, or that they forbear for some substantial reason to controvert his claim or to disturb him in his quiet enjoyment. Secret possession will not do, as publicity and notoriety are necessary as evidence of notice and to put adverse claimants upon inquiry. Mere occupation is not sufficient, but adverse and continuous possession is. Armstrong v. Morrill, 14 Wall. 145-46 (1871), cases, Clifford J.; Hughes v. United States, 4 id. 232 (1866).
The weight of authority is that, where one has had the peaceable, undisturbed, open possession of real or personal property, with an assertion of his ownership, for the period which, under the law, would bar an action for its recovery by the real owner, the former has acquired a good title - a title superior to that of the latter, whose neglect to avail himself of his legal rights has lost him his title. Campell v. Holy, 115 U.S. 623 (1885), cases, Miller, J.; Gilbert v. Decker, 53 Conn. 401-5 (1865), cases; Hollingsworth v. Sherman, 81 Va. 671, 674 (1886), cases.
Adverse possession of vacant lands, under color of title, includes as much as is within the boundaries of the title, and to that extent the true owner is disseised. But if the latter be in actual possession of any part, his constructive seizure extends to not all in fact occupied by the intruder. The reason is, the intruder's acts give notice only to the extent of actual occupancy. Hunnicutt v. Peyton, 102 U.S. 368-69 (1880), cases, Strong, J.
Prescription: Title by prescription is a right which a possessor of land acquires by reason of his diverse possession during a period of time fixed by law, and where it does not originate in fraud, and is under a claim of right. What the primary owner has lost by his laches the other party has gained by continued possession, without question of his right. This is the foundation of the doctrine, which, in the English law, is mainly applied to incorporeal hereditaments, but which in the Roman law, and the codes founded on it, is applied to property of all kinds. A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), page 804.
Settler: Within the meaning of pre-emption laws, one who actually resides upon the land in question. A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), page 944.
Pre-emptor: He who holds such prior right of purchase. One who by settlement on the public land or by cultivating a portion of it has obtained the right to purchase a portion of such land, to the exclusion of all other persons. A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), page 800.
Squatter's right: The "right" to ownership of land merely because you have occupied it for a long time. This is different than adverse possession and is not recognized as a right in most places. Oran's Dictionary of the Law.
Squatter: A person who settles or locates on land without obtaining legal title. n.
1. a person or thing that squats.
2. a person who occupies property without permission, lease, or payment of rent.
3. a person who settles on land under government regulation, in order to acquire title.
A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), page 963.
1. One who squats; specifically, one who settles unlawfully upon land without a title. In the United States and Australia the term is sometimes applied also to a person who settles lawfully upon government land under permission and restrictions, before acquiring title. In such a tract, squatters and trespassers were tolerated to an extent now unknown. Macaulay.
2. (Zoöl.) See Squat snipe, under Squat. Squatter sovereignty, the right claimed by the squatters, or actual residents, of a Territory of the United States to make their own laws. [Local, U.S.] Bartlett. Webster Dictionary (1913), Page: 1397.
1. To sit down upon the hams or heels; as, the savages squatted near the fire.
2. To sit close to the ground; to cower; to stoop, or lie close, to escape observation, as a partridge or rabbit.
3. To settle on another's land without title; also, to settle on common or public lands.
Webster Dictionary (1913), Page: 1397.
Support: The right in an owner to rely upon the support afforded his land by the ground adjoining, in its natural state. Spoken of as “lateral,” when the support is thought of as contiguous or adjacent, rather than as subjacent.
The right to support for land in its natural condition is ex jure naturae, not dependent on grant and not acquirable by prescription. The right to support for artificial burdens is an easement acquirable only by grant, express or implied.
Subject to any express grant, reservation, covenant, or inconsistent right gained by prescription, it is well established that when the surface of land belongs to one person and the subjacent earth and minerals to another, the latter is burdened with a natural servitude to support the former, and also that the owner of land is entitled to the performance of a similar servitude of lateral support by adjacent land; but these easements only extend to the land in its natural and unencumbered state, and not with the additional weight of buildings upon it.
Every land-owner has a right to have his land preserved unbroken. An adjacent owner excavating on his land is subject to the restriction that he must not remove the earth so near his neighbor's land that his soil will crumble under its own weight and fall. But this right to lateral support extends only to soil in its natural condition. It does not protect whatever is placed upon the soil increasing the downward and lateral pressure. If it did, it would be in the power of a lot-owner, by erecting heavy buildings, to greatly abridge the right of his neighbor to use his lot. A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), Pages 994-995.
Title: A person may have a title to property although he is not the absolute owner. If he has the actual or constructive possession, or the right of possession, he has a title. A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), Page 1034.
The Government cannot Tax Land, only Patents to Land
The following evidences that the government can only tax the patent to the land, and not the land itself. This is a message from the Governor of Minnesota, which would introduce a Bill for the incorporation of the town of Marmata. The Private Secretary of His Excellency the Governor appeared and presented a message and accompanying documents from the Governor. On motion, the message was read by the Clerk as follows:
St. Paul, Minn., June 15th, 1858
To the Senate and House of Representatives:
I feel it to be my duty to transmit to you, information relative to the affairs of the State, and to recommend such action as, in my judgment, will be most conducive to the public interests.
Owing to the delay attendant upon the induction into office of the State Officers elect, the assessment of property required to be made under the direction of the Auditor, has not yet been commenced. The rolls have been printed and are ready for distribution to the Register of Deeds of the several counties, but some weeks must elapse before they can be placed in the hands of the township assessors. I therefore suggest for your consideration, that the time for the assessment of property be extended to the 15th of August.
The late decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, by which lands owned by individuals for which the patents have not issued, are declared free from taxation, has not been received here in an official form, but there seems to be little doubt that such a decision has been made. In that case a very great diminuation will be the result in the anticipated revenue of the State for taxes the coming year, as in most of the new, and in some of the older counties, large tracts of land have been entered by pre-emption, but no patents have yet been issued. Therefore, I recommend that a memorial be passed as soon as practical, by you, to the President, asking that patents be issued for all such lands by the General Land Office, with the utmost possible expedition, so that they may be included in the assessments for the coming year.
It will probably be found necessary, likewise, to provide more specifically by statute for separate assessments upon the improvements made on these lands, so that in case the patent cannot be issued at a sufficiently early period to enable the assessors to place the land itself on the rolls of the present year, the burden of taxation may be as nearly equalized throughout the State, as circumstances will permit. The man who holds the duplicate of the Land Office is really as much the owner of his land as his neighbor who has received his patent, and a mere technicality should not shield him from sharing equally with that neighbor, in supporting the government which protects both alike in the possession of their property. In the memorial to the President, he might properly be petitioned to instruct the Commissioner of the General Land Office to cause to be transmitted to the Governor, to be filed in the office of the State Auditor, a list of the patents issued, with a description of the lands therein contained, in this State, at the expiration of each three months. If this could be done, the Auditor would have the means in his power to afford correct information to the assessors in the different counties, which they could not readily obtain in any other manner.
In consequence of the depreciated value of real estate everywhere caused by the financial derangements in the country, together with the exemption from taxation of so much land under the decision of the Supreme Court referred to, it would not be safe to base an estimate upon the taxable property of the State, of more than $35,000,000 or $40,000,000. Should the next regular session of the Legislature not take place before the middle of the year 1859, I trust that by exercise of strict economy, the expenses of the intervening period may be met, even upon that reduced basis of calculation. To effect this, however, it will be necessary for you to pass a stringent law, to compel the collecting officers in the different counties to pay into the State Treasury, within a fixed period in each year, the amount for which such counties are liable, for it is evident that the tax system tolerated under the Territorial Government cannot be permitted to continue with safety to the State. There is already due of unpaid taxes from many of the counties between $25,000 and $30,000, which should also be collected during the current year. It does not appear from the books of the late Auditor and Treasurer, that any money remains in the Treasury, and as the report of the latter officer lately made to you, shows that nearly all of the $250,000 has already been appropriated to meet Territorial and State liabilities, leaving a small amount only wherewith to meet the expenses of your session, and other necessary demands, the appropriations for the support of the State Government, etc., must necessarily be in anticipation of the revenue to be derived from taxation. The Constitution limits the State debt to $250,000 so that no further issue of Scrip or other evidences of indebtedness by the State is allowable.
As the law authorizing the loan of $250,000, imposed upon the Government and Treasurer the duty of negotiating it, upon consultation we deemed it most advantageous to receive bids therefore, in the city of New York, and measures have been taken to advertise for proposals there until the first of July next, in the papers of that and other commercial cities.
I propose to meet the Treasurer in New York on the 25th inst., it being advisable for us to have personal interviews with leading capitalists before the expiration of the time specified for receiving proposals, that we may give such verbal explanations with regard to the resources of the State, and particulars connected with the contemplated loan, as may be required. It is my intention, also, to visit Washington before my return to urge upon the President the necessity of causing all the patents for lands in this State, which have not yet been prepared, to be issued without delay.
If someone buys land, or a part of someone else's land, one can just stand on the land. There need not be any "price" recorded for the so-called "purchase," because "...freely ye have received, freely give" (Matthew 10:8). And as far as the government is concerned, the "previous owner" can just inform them that the land is no longer his.
The government might want to contact you and tell you they want their yearly "rent" from you for living on "their" land. If you do not receive free mail delivery, they won't be able to contact you through mail. So, they may try to call you on the phone. When you answer the phone, you should say, "Greetings in the name of Christ Jesus. Do you greet me in the same name?" If they do not understand the question, you may say, "God's Law is the Law I am using, so you must find your answers in there." And if they say they are calling in the name of another besides Christ (i.e. Caesar), you can tell them, "Well, the only purpose for which the Lord brought us together is for us to speak the truth to one another. Therefore, that is what I will discuss, for I am to obey God rather than man."
So, they may try to contact you by coming to your land "in person." Remember, they do not tax the land, they only tax the commercial "title" to the land. If they show you a piece of paper that claims jurisdiction for them, you can tell them, "That piece of paper does not represent or attach to this land." Then point out all the abbreviations on that paper, and show them how it is only an "image," a creation of man.
Posting a Close over the Land, not a No Trespassing Sign
In reading the notice at the bottom of this article, you might think it says the same thing your commercial "NO TRESPASSING" sign says, and this is just so difficult to understand. I am here to tell you there is a universe of difference between the two—a great chasm separating them if you will. Chaff is not wheat, and wheat is not chaff.
We are to enter into that Righteous Relationship with God, through our Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus, by the Grace God gives to men called for His righteous Purposes. It is this relationship which is evidenced to the world by the outward acts (James 2:14-26).
"Outward acts indicate inward intent." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2124.
"Acts indicate the intention." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2124.
The Intent of a bondservant of Christ is twofold: One, to walk meekly before God our Father doing all things for His Glory and Majesty to the end of revealing to the world Him and the Superiority of His Ways as you walk in them; and, Two, to Lawfully execute the Duties and Powers appertaining to the Noble and Sacred Office of the Christ, for the Glory of His only Begotten Son.
God, through His Son, bestows conditional Authority, Powers, Privileges and Immunities to those called by Him. The conditional nature is that those who are called must answer that call by ministering for Him, not for themselves. Let us make no mistake about this—no one has any inherent Lawful "right" to adoption by God. Thus, it is not a matter of "self-will" or "personal choice." It is solely a matter of the Grace of Him Who calls you to repentance. And with it, men find that eternal life in Him Who called them. Having once been called and regenerated by the Power of the Holy Spirit, a new creature is born in a Venue separate from the will of men; and are not subordinate to the will of men, but submissive or meek (praus) only to the voice of their only Master and Shepherd Christ Jesus, the Author of the call. To be born of the Spirit of God is not to be born of the spirit of codes, rules, and regulations. Therefore, the stranger is one who comes in the name or warrant of such things, which are not general laws emanating from the Body of Christ, His ekklesia. This may seem harsh, but stranger is the appropriate word. Because Christ Jesus is the Only Door, then those who do not have that relationship with Him are strangers, not being His several Ministerial Officers executing His Testament.
God, through His Son Christ Jesus, bestows conditionally Rights, Powers, Privileges and Immunities to those called by Him. Let us make no mistake about this—no one has any inherent Lawful right to adoption by God. Thus, it is not a matter of "self-will" or "choice." This is solely a matter of Grace of Him Who calls you to repentance. In this sense, you are under the Grace of God, for without it all would perish. But with it, men find that eternal life in Him Who called. Having once been called and regenerated by the Power of the Holy Spirit, a new creature is born in a Venue separate from the will of men; and are not subordinate to the will of men, but submissive or meek (praus) only to the voice of the Shepherd Christ Jesus, the Author of the call. To be born of the Spirit of God is not to be born of the spirit of codes, rules, and regulations. Therefore, the stranger is one who comes in the name or warrant of such things, which are not general laws emanating from the Body of Christ, the church. This may seem harsh at first, but because Christ Jesus is the Door then those who do not have that relationship with Him, or His several Ministerial Officers executing His Testament, stranger is the appropriate word:
"STRANGERS. By this term is intended third persons generally. Thus the persons bound by a fine are parties, privies, and strangers; the parties are either cognizors or cognizees; the privies are such as are in any way related to those who levy the fine, and claim under them by any right of blood, or other right of representation [*Christ Jesus is our Mediator]; the strangers are all other persons in the world, except only the parties and privies. In its general legal signification the term is opposed to the word 'privy.' Those who are in no way parties to a covenant [*establishing the Inheritance and adoption], nor bound by it [*Lawless, anomian and antinomians] are also said to be strangers to the covenant. Brown. See Robbins v. Chicago, 4 Wall. 672, 18 L.Ed. 427; Wilson v. Smith, 213 Ky. 836, 281 S.W. 1008, 1010; State v. Mills, 23 N.M. 549, 169 P. 1171, 1173; Gronewold v. Gronewold, 304 Ill. 11, 136 N.E. 489, 490. See, also, STRANGER." Black's Law Dictionary (4th ed., 1968), p. 1590. [Emphasis and insertions added.]
Beware then, of those who come in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravening wolves, seeking whom they may devour: "PERSONATE. In criminal law. To assume the person (character) of another, without his consent or knowledge, in order to deceive others, and, in such feigned character, to fraudulently do some act or gain some advantage, to the harm or prejudice of the person counterfeited. 2 East, P.C. 1010. To pass one's self off as another having a certain identity. Lane v. U.S., C.C.A.Ohio, 17 F.2d 923." Black's Law Dictionary (4th ed., 1957 & 1968), p. 1301. The stranger is of the will of man, for the Ways of God are not the ways of man:
Isaiah 55:8-9, "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
If you are an heir, then you must manifest such by bearing the fruits of repentance—obedience and meekness—and claim that Inheritance of God given you through Christ Jesus, "for the meek shall inherit the earth." See Mt 5:5 and Ps 37:11. Such is the foregoing notice—but it is not the earth you Inherit—it is the Close you Inherit, that Righteous Warrant in the Law which establishes the Power to claim the land in His Name and not your own. We cannot, and, in deed must not, use any commercial counterfeits. Why? Because of the following maxims of Law:
"The cause and origin is the substance of the thing; the cause and origin of a thing are a material part of it." Black's Law Dictionary (4th ed., 1957 & 1968), p. 278; Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2127. "That which is the principal part of a thing is the thing itself." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2166.
If you use a commercial counterfeit, then the source is not God's Law—it is the lex mercatoria. Thus, there is no sanctification or separation from and between yourself and the commercial world. You will have ignorantly imported the fiction over the Truth in Christ Jesus, thereby marring the Seal of, and grieving, the Holy Spirit of God our Father. You must declare the Law written on your heart having the Seal of the Spirit of God which evidences and witnesses your adoption by God our Father in and through Christ Jesus. It is the adoption and evidence or witness of the Holy Spirit which gives evidence or witness of interest in the Close declared by the Law. The two are like a hand in a glove. If you use a commercial counterfeit, the foot does not fit a glove made for the hand; neither does a sock properly fit a hand. You must use the law fit for the purpose and God's Law is the only law that governs the Close given you by Him through Christ Jesus:
Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." [This is the original act bringing the estate into being. All other derivative estates are necessarily dependent upon and governed by the Intent and Will of God, our Creator.]
"The law is the highest inheritance that the king possesses; for by the law both he and all his subjects are ruled; and if there were no law, there would be neither king nor inheritance." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2142.
"The law of God and the law of the land are all one; and both preserve and favor the common good of the land." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2142.
"But one who is prevented from doing a contemplated illegal act cannot maintain an action for damages for the interference with his illegal purpose." Bangor, etc., R. Co. v. Smith, 49 Me. 9, 77 Am.D. 246.
"Trespass distinguished. Waste is an injury to the inheritance by one rightfully in possession of the property. Trespass is an injury to the estate or the use thereof by one who is a stranger to the title, with no right whatever in the property." Stephenson v. National Bank of Winter Haven, 109 So. 424, 425, 92 Fla. 347; Brigham v. Overstreet, 57 S.E. 484, 128 Ga. 447, 10 L.R.A.N.S. 452, 11 Ann.Cas. 75; Dahlquist v. Mattson, 233 P. 883, 886, 40 Idaho 378; Duvall v. Waters, 1 Bland 569, 18 Am.D. 350; Price v. Ward, 58 P. 849, 25 Nev. 203, 46 L.R.A. 459; Roots v. Boring Junction Lumber Co., 92 P. 811, 94 P. 182, 50 Or. 298; Walker v. Fox, 2 S.W. 98, 85 Tenn. 154; Lander v. Hall, 34 N.W. 80, 69 Wisc. 326; Lowndes v. Bettle (English), 33 L.J.Ch. 451.
Notice to All Breaking the Close over this land:
Obedient sons of God our Father solely by His Grace through our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus the Christ, to all breaking this Close of and over this land, greetings from God our Father, and His Son Christ Jesus:
In the Blessed Name and Authority of our Lord and Saviour Jesus the Christ, by His Direction and Mandate and under His Warrant in His Testament, we hereby post the following at the gates to this Close of and over this land and on the door posts of the dwelling-house thereof: Whereas, the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof, and His Intent manifested in His original Act in His Testament of bringing into being His Estate governs all derived from it; therefore when God our Father sent His Son to execute His Testament according to His Will, so His Son sent into the world those called by Him from the foundation of the world for His Dignity, Glory, Majesty and Purposes; and,
Whereas, all Power in heaven and in earth hath been committed to Christ Jesus by God our Father, Who bestows the same upon those Whom He hath called and sent into the world in execution of, and to execute, the Righteous Judgments in His Holy Writ in His Name and under His Warrants contained therein; and,
Whereas, as many as believe in and on His Son He gives the power to become the sons of God by and through adoption, and a son hath Inheritance common in all other sons through and in Christ Jesus, therefore the Close of and over this land and all Dominion in and of the Inheritance established by, through and in Christ Jesus, have been Willed by God our Father, through our Sovereign Lord and Saviour Jesus the Christ, to His sons and his seed in perpetuity; and,
Whereas, the Will of our King and Testator in His Law and Testament instituting the Inheritance establishes and governs the Dominion of those who Inherit the Close of and over this land instituted by our King in His Law and Testament, therefore those who act and do contrary to the Will of our King and Testator are not His sons, but bastards, having no Close or Dominion in and to any Inheritance established by the Will of our Blessed King and Testator; and,
Whereas, the Law of God and the law of the land are all one, and both favour and preserve the common good of the land, therefore ignorance of God's Law is no excuse, for all men know God, even His eternal Power and Godhood, and are not presumed ignorant of their eternal welfare; and,
Wherefore, any and all who enter here without consent evidenced by Warrant in Law from God our Father, through our Sovereign Lord and Saviour Jesus the Christ, and His several appointed Ministerial Officers having and being of one Mind in the Christ, but enter either in their own name or by the name of a stranger having no Dominion of and in the Inheritance common among all bondservants of Jesus the Christ: One, break this Close; Two, breach the Peace of our King, by violating His Law establishing this Close and all Powers appertaining to His Noble and Sacred Ministerial Office; Three, disturb, and thereby destroy the Domestic Tranquility of His sons; Four, endanger His Inheritance in and of His sons by adoption; and, Five, are, in His Law governing this Close, trespassers, thieves, and robbers having not entered through the Door; and,
Therefore, an action of trespass quare clausam fregit will lie against all such who break this Close through or under such pretenses or color of Law.
Junking the Title to Land
Many people have asked about how one can junk the registration to land, similar to how one can junk the title to an automobile. One brother we know of had a ten-acre plot of land. He sub-divided it into two five-acre plots of land. He did the research on how to do this himself, to avoid dividing his land through the usual means. Anyway, once the land is divided, it erases the tax number associated with that plot of land. Caesar then waits for the land to be re-registered so it can assign two new tax numbers to the two new pieces of land (which usually happens immediately when it's done through the usual means). Our brother did not re-register his land, and has never received a tax bill for his land in over ten years.
We also have two different laws from two different States, explaining how to junk the title to the land. The first law is from North Carolina which explains how one can junk the registration, and it will be "as if such estate had never been so registered." The second law is from New York and explains how to "withdrawal from registration." These laws are duplicated here for your edification. To find out the corresponding law in your state, you will have to do some cross-referencing at the law library.
General Statutes of North Carolina
Chapter 43 – Land Registration
Section 43-25 – Release from registration
Whenever the record owner of any estate in lands the title to which has been registered or attempted to be registered in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, desires to have such estate released from the provisions of said Chapter insofar as said Chapter relates to the form of conveyance, so that such estate may ever thereafter be conveyed, either absolutely or upon condition or trust, by the use of any desired form of conveyance other than the certificate of title prescribed by said Chapter, such owner may present his owner's certificate of title to such registered estate to the register of deeds of the county wherein such land lies, with a memorandum or statement written by him on the margin thereof in the words following, or words of similar import, to wit: "I (or we), _____________, being the owner (or owners) of the registered estate evidenced by this certificate of title, do hereby release said estate from the provisions of Chapter 43 of the General Statutes of North Carolina insofar as said Chapter relates to the form of conveyance, so that hereafter the said estate may, and shall be forever until again hereafter registered in accordance with the provisions of said Chapter and acts amendatory thereof, conveyed either absolutely or upon condition or trust by any form of conveyance other than the certificate of title prescribed by said Chapter, and in the same manner as if said estate had never been registered." Which said memorandum or statement shall further state that it is made pursuant to the provisions of this section and shall be signed by such record owner and attested by the register of deeds under his hand and official seal, and a like memorandum or statement so entered, signed and attested upon the margin of the record of the said owner's certificate of title in the consolidated real property records in said register's office, with the further notation made and signed by the register of deeds on the margin of the certificate of title in the consolidated real property records showing that such entry has been made upon the owner's certificate of title; and thereafter any conveyance of such registered estate, or any part thereof, by such owner, his heirs or assigns, by means of any desired form of conveyance other than such certificate of title shall be as valid and effectual to pass such estate of the owner according to the tenor and purport of such conveyance in the same manner and to the same extent as if such estate had never been so registered. (Ex. Sess. 1924. c. 40; 2000-140, s. 42(b).
New York State Consolidated Laws
ARTICLE 12 - Registering Title to Real Property
Section 404. Registered property to remain registered. The bringing of property under this article shall imply an agreement, running with the land and binding upon the applicant and all his successors in interest or title, that the property shall be subject to the terms of this article, and all amendments and alterations thereof, and all dealings with the property so registered, or any estate, right or interest therein, after the same has been brought under this article, and all liens, incumbrances and charges upon the same after the first registration thereof shall be subject to the terms of this article.
Section 404-a. Withdrawal from registration in certain instances. Notwithstanding the provisions of section four hundred four of this chapter, a title to real property which has been duly registered as provided by article twelve thereof may be withdrawn from such registration upon application to the supreme court by the owner of the fee title to the property. An application for such withdrawal from registration may be filed with the registrar of the county in which the title is then registered and shall be entitled "in the matter of the application of (stating the name of the registered owner) for the withdrawal from registration of the title to certain lands." Such application, in such form as may be approved by the registrar, must be made by the registered owner of the fee of the real property. It shall set forth and recite in detail the name and postoffice address of the registered owner, the number of the certificate of title last issued, the date of the last registration of the title, a description of the real property as stated in the certificate of title together with a reference to the proper section, block and lot numbers if any, a complete recital of all memorials entered on the certificate of title, the names and addresses of all persons owning any incumbrance, charge, trust or lien on the premises, a statement of all unpaid taxes, assessments and water rates due and payable, a statement of the circumstances existing which render continued registration of the title impracticable and inexpedient, and a prayer for the withdrawal from registration. The application shall be duly verified and executed in duplicate. The registrar shall file one copy as a document in his office and enter the same as a memorial on the certificate of title to which it relates. The other copy shall be delivered to an official examiner of title who shall forthwith proceed to examine the title since the date of the first or initial registration thereof and investigate the facts set forth in the application. Thereafter he shall make a report in writing to the supreme court of his findings and a recommendation as to the proper disposition of the application. The registrar shall set down a date for hearing on the application in the "title part" of a special term of the supreme court, which date shall be not less than twenty days after the filing of the application; and he shall notify by certified mail demanding a personally signed return receipt card all persons or parties who appear by the report of the official examiner of title to have any interest in or incumbrance, charge, trust, or lien upon the said real property. At the hearing any of the parties in interest may appear and consent or object to the granting of the prayer of the application. Whether granted or denied, the supreme court shall enter an order disposing of the application and after such order is filed with the clerk of the county a transcript or certified copy of the same shall be filed with the registrar and by him entered as a memorial on the certificate of title. When the order of the supreme court grants a withdrawal from registration of a title to real property as herein provided, the registered owner thereof shall forthwith deliver to the registrar and surrender his owner`s duplicate certificate of title, or if the same has been lost or destroyed a new owner`s duplicate certificate of title obtained as provided in section four hundred fourteen of this chapter. The registrar shall then cause the owner`s duplicate certificate of title to be recorded in the office of the recording officer of the county in which the real property is located, and thereafter permanently filed in his own office. A certified copy of the record shall be delivered to the registered owner as his future evidence of title. The recording of the owner`s duplicate certificate of title shall be notice of the recitals and matters therein contained, and shall also be notice of the fact that the title to the real property therein described is no longer registered nor subject to the provisions of article twelve of this chapter. From the time of such recording and until any future or further registration of the title thereof, said property shall be and become as to all matters subsequent to the time of such recording subject to all provisions of law relating to real property the title to which has not at any time been registered.
The final order and judgment of registration by the court pursuant to which the aforesaid title to real property was originally registered shall continue to be binding and conclusive as a decree or judgment of the supreme court in the same manner and to the same extent and be of the same force and effect as if the said title had not been withdrawn from registration in accordance with the provisions of this section. The fee of the registrar for all services rendered by him and by the official examiner of title pursuant to this section shall be the sum of one hundred dollars payable at the time of filing of the application for withdrawal from registration, and one-half of the said fee shall be transferred by the registrar to the assurance fund provided for by section four hundred and twenty-six of this chapter. In addition thereto the applicant shall pay to the registrar and the official examiner of title, their necessary expenses and disbursements incurred in connection with the withdrawal of the title from registration.
arrow Return to Christ's Lawful Assembly